The anti-vaccine movement has been in the news a lot lately.
Well-known anti-vaccination advocate Jenny McCarthy started on television’s The View this week, measles outbreaks struck Texas and Wales and children are
headed back to school; prompting parents to question vaccine schedules.
During a Season 10 episode of Law & Order: Special
Victims Unit, the hypothetical scenario was a mother who decided not to
vaccinate her child for measles based on rumors that the vaccine causes autism.
The child contracts measles at age four and passes it on to a one-year old
child at the daycare center who is too young for the vaccine. The baby dies in
the episode with the title “Selfish.”
A paper in the Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics explores
whether people can be held legally accountable for damage they cause by not
vaccinating their children. Bioethicist Arthur L. Caplan is a co-author on the paper and states: “One can make a legitimate, state-sanctioned choice not to
vaccinate, but that does not protect the person making the choice against the
consequences of that choice for others.” The paper argues that a parent who
decides not to vaccinate and endangers another child is clearly at fault and
could be charged with criminally negligent homicide or sued for damages.
“Parents who choose not to vaccinate their kids for reasons
of personal belief pose a serious danger to the public,” stated Jed Lipinski of the Albuquerque Journal. “Take the San Diego measles outbreak of 2008. After
unknowingly contracting the disease on a trip to Switzerland, an unvaccinated
7-year old boy infected 11 other unvaccinated kids, according to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”
“The majority of the cases occurred in kids whose parents
had requested personal belief exemptions through the state of California,”
Lipinski continues. “But three of the infected were either too young or
medically unable to be vaccinated. And overall, 48 children too young to be
vaccinated were quarantined, at an average cost to the family of $775 per
child. The CDC noted that all 11 cases were ‘linked epidemiologically’ to the
7-year old boy and the outbreak response cost the public sector $10,376 per
case.”
Caplan, Lipinski and others all agree that the government’s
interest in protecting children from getting measles should trump parents’
interest in making medical decisions for their kids. Lipinski believes extra
measures need to be taken to ensure non-vaccinators understand the risk they
pose to other people’s children.
Vaccine Watch urges parents to seek answers to vaccine
questions from their child’s pediatrician. As Caplan and Lipinski point out –
choosing not to vaccinate your child can have much greater consequences than
most parents realize.
No comments:
Post a Comment